Re: I like(d) Nick but...
On Jul 14, 2:37 pm, Bonbon <tresbon...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jul 14, 8:27�am, "KAT" <n...@none.invalid> wrote:
>
> > "Dana" <danamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:487aa4b6$0$12031$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>
> > >>The scuttlebut is that he's going to get involved with Max' sister.
>
>
> > > And I hope it drives Chelsea nuts.
>
> > Amen!
>
> Okay, in all honesty, and in real life, why would you stay with
> someone you didn't care for? I don't think Chelsea ever really
> "loved" Nick. But he showed her love and attention which made her
> gravitate toward him. So, when she found someone who did turn her on,
> she broke it off with Nick. And, I thought she did it very nicely.
>
> That said, I think she probably used him to some extent but not to the
> point that she needs to suffer if Nick moves on to someone else.
>
> JMO, of course!
>
> Bonbon
I agree ten thousand percent. I don't think Chelsea was ever gung ho
for the guy in the first place and the whole lonely splicer
(initially) secretive element of the whole thing was what really
turned her on to him. I think Chelsea is rather immature and is more
interested in how a guy makes a play for her than the relationship(s)
themselves.
In some ways she has even aknowledged this about herself on the show.
She had made airheaded little comments here and there about how now
that she's got the guy she's "bored" or "what next?" to characters
like Abby, Steph, Max, Morgan, Cordie, etc. I think the *actress*
herself is one of the best on the show and she gives a very convincing
portrayal of such a flawed character, but Chelsea, the way she is
written, is quite self centered, (just like Kate when she dates or
gets involved with someone) and really has a lot of growing up to do.
S*Babykins
suzee
Bonbon
